The Supreme Court and "originalism"?

I had a long rant about about this, but I think it missed what should be a clean point.

The constitution only deals with a few, limited number of specific items. It was limited by the times and knowledge of the founders. Almost all of the cases argued before the Supreme Court are not directly mentioned in the constitution and require a vast amount of interpretation. The idea of "originalism", in that a Justice "should interpret its text as text, and understand it to have the meaning that it had at the time people ratified it. So that meaning doesn't change over time and it's not up to me to update it or infuse my own policy views into it." This is just ludicrous. The constitution doesn't mention anything about abortion, healthcare, marriage, political contributions, or hundreds of other issues. It is up to a Justice to make judgements that are consistent with that which is in the constitution using their own personal experiences and expertise to come to that conclusion. Otherwise, there would never be anytime one Originalists differs from another (which happens all the time). For a Justice to insist, their own personal views will not come into play is a straight out lie, since they know it certainly will. 

Side note: Ask an originalist, does the constitution protect the right to bear arms for any other group except a well regulated militia. If we are just going by the text, it clearly does not, and therefore, any group or person outside a well regulated militia is not covered by this amendment. Right?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Free Shakespeare Tickets - Contest #3

My girlfriend and I have two extra tickets to Much Ado About Nothing in the park tonight (Saturday August 7). Since we thought selling free tickets was a little unethical, we decided to have a contest to see who needs them the most. So, if you are interested please go to http://danlipka.blogspot.com/ and post a comment that best describes why you want/need the tickets. The stories can be made up, but you have to specifically say if it is fictional (true stories carry more weight than fiction, but creativity is also a good thing). If you have any questions post them on the blog or email them to me. Tickets can be picked up on the upper east side or by the theater. Contest ends at 6:00 unless something changes, (well maybe at 5:30). Good Luck. 6:14 - It's all over. We have selected and contacted the winners. I’m sorry to all those who weren’t chosen, as you all were deserving of the tickets. To those couples that couldn’t get to go, I say to spend the night together, have a roma
Read more

The Constitution and Justice

When the Supreme Court rules, they often struggle to understand the depth and meanings in some of the words or phrases in the Constitution. However, the Founders provided very clear language as to what they were trying to accomplish from a vision standpoint. Although not the law, the Preamble provides critical guidance that should be the first reference for any court ruling. "We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America." Specifically, the word "Justice". It is the very first thing they wanted to establish. Justice should be the defining feature of any law, and anything that increase injustice should be unconstitutional. The very first question at any Supreme Court hearing should always be
Read more

Lessons from History - Democracy

"Many forms of Government have been tried, and will be tried in this world of sin and woe. No one pretends that democracy is perfect or all-wise. Indeed it has been said that democracy is the worst form of Government except for all those other forms that have been tried from time to time" - Winston Churchill I am currently reading biographies on each of the US Presidents. I'm only on Madison, but I've learned some incredible insights into the dysfunctions of our government. Since the Articles of Confederation were adopted in 1777, politicians and the wealthy have been constantly undermining justice, equality, and the idea that they should prioritize the good of the nation above all else. The disgraces of current politicians are nothing new and have been part of US political culture since our country's founding. For example, the southern states refused to adopt the constitution unless it counted enslaved people at 3/5 of a person for the purposes of having more ele
Read more